Carolinaboy
Full Access Member
I like the look of the one that Matt posted 
I have an 09 Malibu 2LT with the 4 cylinder 6 speed trans. We bought it new and have about 40,000 miles on it. We love it. My wife drives it 85% of the time and gets around 28-30 MPG. It has lot of room in it IMO since I am 6' tall and have enough head room for me. So it has been a great car with no issues at all. I would highly recommand it.
That appears to be what I am seeing everywhere. People love them and have hardly any, if any problems mechanically/physically at all.
So since you both have 40k miles it it and its an 09 model there is a high chance than this one I am looking at was just driven daily and racked up some miles you think? Dealership is closed until Monday, this is going to be a long weekend.
Yes it just looks like a regular Daily driver. We bought our 09 at the end of 08 so we had it for about 2.5 years. Even if the car is 2 years old, 20,000 miles a year is about normal for a DD. I would look into it for sure.
To bad there isn't any Car Max in Pa.
True, but I'd be willing to drive 200 miles to pick up a vehicle with less than half the mileage of another one.
To avoid any agreement go with the Chevy Malibu.
Can you provide more information as to why you chose the Malibu? A good experience?
Know someone with negative Fusion commentary?
Going off by the fact of the 2010 Fusion is a semi-redesign and the Malibu is not?
Just straight up don't like the new Fusion?
Okay okay, relax, I'm not a fan of either car so I have no dog in this fight.
Personally there hasn't been any comparison between these to cars but I can only conclude factually from the known facts.
According to their price tags the Malibu ranges between $19995 - $26995 compare that to the fusion with price tags of $17770- $24385. The Malibu is more expensive, about $2,000 more than the fusion. The Malibu's curb weight is 3649 lbs, the Fusion is 3280 lbs. According to my calculations, that's 369 pounds heavier than the Fusion.
A Bigger V6 in the Malibu produces more horsepower and more torque but at a cost of lower miles per gallon in city driving. Worst part is that the Malibu has a smaller fuel tank, 16 gallons to be exact. That is a 1 1/2 gallons smaller than the Fusion; hence, the driving range gets smaller.
The Malibu's front suspension is good old struts (cheap to build). Compare that to the Fusion which uses control arms which in my right opinion are a lot better for handling. Nevertheless, the Malibu has bigger turning circle by more than a half-foot.
I can go on and on as to why the Ford Fusion would be a better choice but knowing the fanboys who would defend their brand to my death, I stand by what I posted....... to avoid any arguments I'll say what the fandboys want to hear, the Malibu is the better choice.
I say buy an Aurora.
Just drives it the 2 miles to work and back and then takes it out on the highway to clean it out every so often

I'd be leery as hell about buying a rental car.