Lower thermostats, really needed?

JennaBear

Sponsor
Joined
May 20, 2009
Posts
3,619
Reaction score
0
Location
Sandy Eggo, CA
A common belief is that a cooler running engine will reduce intake air temperature. The reality is that outside of idle, there is very little heat transferred from the engine to the intake charge. The mass of air moving across the incredibly small surface area of the intake ports is too large and too fast to allow for any large temperature transferance.

As a vehicle sits out overnight, you may notice condensation on the windows, hood, etc from moisture in the air. That same moisture ends up in the crank case as well. An engine that does not reach the manufacturers operating temperature will not as easily boil off that condensation, especially if only short trips are taken.

Here is some info to further whet your palate: Low Temp Thermostats: What’s the Advantage? | Tuner University

With a 160* thermostat, the average operating temperature of a GM engine is approximately 180*. With the OEM thermostat, it is around 199*. A few minutes on the dyno can quickly show temps above 210-220*, regardless of the thermostat. As long as intake air temperatures remain static, power output is static and sometimes even BETTER under the 210-220* range.

In short, keep your stock tstat.
 

mr_bots

People in glass houses sink ships
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Posts
9,245
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Kickass
:thumbs:

I know there's a lot of BS floating around forums about cooler running engines, better for the hoses and cables, etc. I figure by now the OEMs know what they're doing with engine temperature.
 

Zembonez

живи свободно или умри
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 17, 2009
Posts
57,295
Reaction score
36
Good info Jenna. Makes way too much sense for the monobrow old school hot rodders though.
 

JennaBear

Sponsor
Joined
May 20, 2009
Posts
3,619
Reaction score
0
Location
Sandy Eggo, CA
Really, the only exceptions would be the 8.1L and the 2500HD 6.0L, but that is due to design flaws.

The lower tstat goes back to the old days when block and intake were solid iron and it made a difference.
 

Kennyray

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Posts
41,069
Reaction score
410
Location
Ossian, IN
Really, the only exceptions would be the 8.1L and the 2500HD 6.0L, but that is due to design flaws.

The lower tstat goes back to the old days when block and intake were solid iron and it made a difference.
And carbureted. A lower t-stat in todays technology will make the car run rich.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
28,836
Posts
1,109,352
Members
4,800
Latest member
SpeakerMan
Back
Top