E15... Coming to a Pump Near You

Zembonez

живи свободно или умри
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 17, 2009
Posts
57,295
Reaction score
36
E85 dropped my mileage in the Titan from 15 to 12 in mixed driving. I can't tell much if any difference in the E10 stuff we have versus pure gasoline. Maybe a tenth or two of a MPG off... :dunno:
 

Tucson Z60

I know your your type...she's inflatable!
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Posts
620
Reaction score
1
I can do on 100% 17.8 to 17.9 for an average. On E10 I do 16.1 to 16.8 and that depends on the station. Costco I do better, Volero I do worse???
 

Texas Jim

Texas..It's a Whole 'nuther Country
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Posts
49,927
Reaction score
0
Location
Ft. Worth
You guys are nuts. E85 only loses one around 15-20%.

EDIT: I just realized that's 15-20% over E10 so the overall loss is a bit higher. I still think you are all guessing on the high side though.

I run REAL GAS every time i get a chance... which sadly, is less and less often.
It was a lot easier to find six and a half years ago when I first bought the Caddy..
I compared it numerous times VS the 10% stuff.

After comparing it for the last six and a half years and over 150,000 miles on the two Caddys... I usually get around 21/22 on 10%... 23/24 on REAL GAS...

That's just on "MY" car... everyone else's might be different...
Just my person opinion, but I think Ethanol in the gas SUCKS...and does no good what so ever at reducing gasoline used by automobiles.
 

Nick The Great

The lead sled dog is the only one with a decent vi
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 26, 2009
Posts
13,290
Reaction score
1
Location
It's not heaven . . . it's Iowa!
:dunno: I can't effectively argue against anyone's findings on ethanol, but adding 10% WATER to your fuel would result in a 10% less fuel economy. Ethanol is 30% less efficient, so if you add 10% ethanol, you should only really get 3% less MPG.

Theoretically of course :D
 

Texas Jim

Texas..It's a Whole 'nuther Country
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Posts
49,927
Reaction score
0
Location
Ft. Worth
:dunno: I can't effectively argue against anyone's findings on ethanol, but adding 10% WATER to your fuel would result in a 10% less fuel economy. Ethanol is 30% less efficient, so if you add 10% ethanol, you should only really get 3% less MPG.

Theoretically of course
:D

:lolup:.... I am not really trying to bash Ethanol... I just don't see that it helps anything, if other cars have the same drop in mileage that mine does.
I can't truthfully report on "PERFORMANCE", because I have not tested it with a stopwatch or on a track... but when I am running "REAL GAS" the car "SEEMS" to run a little better and idle just a little bit smoother.
I will admit... part of that about performance and idle could just be in my head ... :lol: :lol:
 

daddy

I'm too LAZY to Choose a Custom Title!!!
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 17, 2009
Posts
46,700
Reaction score
72
Location
Pawnee, IN
Technically, the performance should be better.
 

Nick The Great

The lead sled dog is the only one with a decent vi
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 26, 2009
Posts
13,290
Reaction score
1
Location
It's not heaven . . . it's Iowa!
:dunno: I can't effectively argue against anyone's findings on ethanol, but adding 10% WATER to your fuel would result in a 10% less fuel economy. Ethanol is 30% less efficient, so if you add 10% ethanol, you should only really get 3% less MPG.

Theoretically of course
:D

:lolup:.... I am not really trying to bash Ethanol... I just don't see that it helps anything, if other cars have the same drop in mileage that mine does.
I can't truthfully report on "PERFORMANCE", because I have not tested it with a stopwatch or on a track... but when I am running "REAL GAS" the car "SEEMS" to run a little better and idle just a little bit smoother.
I will admit... part of that about performance and idle could just be in my head ... :lol: :lol:

Well I've always admitted there is a drop in mileage. AND the cost drop needs to be appropriate for that.

If you got 10% less MPG but it costs 25% less, it wouldn't seem so bad. :lol:

And the cost thing is a whole 'nother thread on a forum with a "Politics" section. :crackup:
 

Texas Jim

Texas..It's a Whole 'nuther Country
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Posts
49,927
Reaction score
0
Location
Ft. Worth
:dunno: I can't effectively argue against anyone's findings on ethanol, but adding 10% WATER to your fuel would result in a 10% less fuel economy. Ethanol is 30% less efficient, so if you add 10% ethanol, you should only really get 3% less MPG.

Theoretically of course
:D

:lolup:.... I am not really trying to bash Ethanol... I just don't see that it helps anything, if other cars have the same drop in mileage that mine does.
I can't truthfully report on "PERFORMANCE", because I have not tested it with a stopwatch or on a track... but when I am running "REAL GAS" the car "SEEMS" to run a little better and idle just a little bit smoother.
I will admit... part of that about performance and idle could just be in my head ... :lol: :lol:

Well I've always admitted there is a drop in mileage. AND the cost drop needs to be appropriate for that.

If you got 10% less MPG but it costs 25% less, it wouldn't seem so bad. :lol:

And the cost thing is a whole 'nother thread on a forum with a "Politics" section. :crackup:

In the few areas I have found "REAL GAS" in the last year or two... the cost is about the same.... :dunno:
 

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
28,836
Posts
1,109,352
Members
4,800
Latest member
SpeakerMan
Back
Top