Well it's confirmed....

Z71_Silvy

I'm too LAZY to Choose a Custom Title!!!
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Posts
1,693
Reaction score
0
Someone say 4-door Raptor:

Ford-F-150-SVT-Raptor-Crew-Cab-1.jpg


Aside from various shortcomings, I wish they would have gone the extra mile and made the headlights and taillights fit the wider fenders. It looks so half-assed:

attachment.php


And the 6.2 is a must...but question the 3K price tag when the 5.0...WITH THE SAME AMOUNT OF POWER...hardly raised the price of a Mustang GT (2010 vs 2011).
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    12.2 KB · Views: 25

mr_bots

People in glass houses sink ships
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Posts
9,245
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Kickass
Even with the 5.0 I'd take the 6.2. Sure, the numbers on paper aren't too far off. But what about the power bands? I'd take a larger, simplier, engine over a smaller higher tech one any day. Although idk about the $3k upgrade price.
 

Z71_Silvy

I'm too LAZY to Choose a Custom Title!!!
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Posts
1,693
Reaction score
0
Even with the 5.0 I'd take the 6.2. Sure, the numbers on paper aren't too far off. But what about the power bands? I'd take a larger, simplier, engine over a smaller higher tech one any day. Although idk about the $3k upgrade price.

I would hate to think that a decent torque curve costs $3K...the engine is worth $1K tops...
 

CJ Hungus

Moderator
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Posts
24,025
Reaction score
5
Location
Ham Lake, MN
Even with the 5.0 I'd take the 6.2. Sure, the numbers on paper aren't too far off. But what about the power bands? I'd take a larger, simplier, engine over a smaller higher tech one any day. Although idk about the $3k upgrade price.

I would hate to think that a decent torque curve costs $3K...the engine is worth $1K tops...
Its the 8 extra spark plugs....
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
28,836
Posts
1,109,352
Members
4,800
Latest member
SpeakerMan
Back
Top