Did you read any of the following posts before bashing you head against the wall?
This entire thread was about the fire recall and the update implied Chrysler gave in and was going to go through with the recall. I didn't read the article Jim linked to, I just made an assumption given that the entire thread was about the fire-prone recall.
Jim later explained it was for a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT RECALL. We all assumed the update was for the recall in the thread title.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.