PJB4x4
Ford F-150
'78-'79.
I love the looks of them. I never cared much for the earlier Bronco's. The later ones are ok though.
I love the looks of them. I never cared much for the earlier Bronco's. The later ones are ok though.

Is that a "Nite" bronco?![]()

I dont think they made the Nite before the '92 front end update and that one is an '87-'91Is that a "Nite" bronco?![]()
No its a Ford Bronco...
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

Them pesky vettes.I wasnt too impressed with the 302 in my '92 Mustang. I later swapped it out for a 347 stroker and it still wasnt all that impressive. It got murdered in a race with a stock '01 ZO6.

Umm the SBC.The 302 5.0 engine was one of the best engines ever made. Starting as a 260 ci in Early 60s falcons and the 64 1/2 mustang, then punched out to 289 from 65 to 67 and finally punched out to 302 by 68. From 68 the 302 was used till 2001. I've owned a 66 mustang with a 289, a 77 Lincoln with a 302, a 72 van with a 302, 84 f150 with a 302, a 86 E150 with 5.0 efi and various 60s-70s F series trucks that I yanked the engines out of and replaced with a 302. So to say the least I know my way around a 302 engine. Any one who dogs this engine seriously has no idea what their talking about. What other engine can say it had an almost 40 year production run? Judging it just from working on one vehicle that is 20 years old is...... REALLY?
![]()
Specifically the tree fiddy.