We really can't speculate much here until some real world testing by consumers/owners. I would bet that the the Diesel Cruze would be more economic in comparison to the Cruze Eco by 5-8 mpg on average.
If the Chevy DC has any bit of improved technology over the VW, Cruze's fuel mileage on highway could easily achieve 45-50+
I've had gas trucks and diesels. Diesels prove themselves to be worthwhile if not more economic when it comes to performance, life expectancy and repairs.

We really can't speculate much here until some real world testing by consumers/owners. I would bet that the the Diesel Cruze would be more economic in comparison to the Cruze Eco by 5-8 mpg on average.
If the Chevy DC has any bit of improved technology over the VW, Cruze's fuel mileage on highway could easily achieve 45-50+
I've had gas trucks and diesels. Diesels prove themselves to be worthwhile if not more economic when it comes to performance, life expectancy and repairs.

I love the smell of diesel in the morning...![]()
I love the smell of diesel in the morning...![]()
Me too.....but there is no way to justify the substantial extra cost for the marginal improvement in fuel economy. If there was, I'd have an oil burner.![]()
They were talking about the little bitty Cruze getting 40mpg with the diesel...
Back in '81, I had an Olds 98 Regency (the biggest thing Olds made) with the 350 V8 diesel.
After I added true duals and had the pump turned up, it would get 35 mpg if you drove it at around the speed limit.
If a big ol' car like that, with a V8, can get 35... why can't these little cars with tiny engines get better than 40??![]()
![]()
![]()
