Oh Thank God!

Bigredmariner

I'm too LAZY to Choose a Custom Title!!!
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Posts
35,883
Reaction score
35
Location
United State of Texas
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/30/honda-na-president-re-recommits-to-ridgeline/


Honda NA president re-recommits to Ridgeline


01-2012-honda-ridgeline-sport628.jpg


Despite consistently slow sales, Honda has executed a slight facelift for the Ridgeline's 2012 model year and begun offering a new low-cost Sport model (pictured) to enhance appeal. But the unibody four-door pickup's sales have been lackluster since its 2006 model year debut, leading to widespread speculation that the Ridgeline would disappear from showrooms altogether. The rumormill eventually built up enough steam that American Honda's Truck Planner, Sage Marie, was compelled to take the unusual step of addressing the gossip head-on last month with an official statement confirming the truck is "here to stay." However, that statement of support didn't shed any light on future developments for the model.

We're here in Japan for the 2011 Tokyo Motor Show, and we've had the chance to talk with Tetsu Iwamura, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Honda, about the future of the Ridgeline. According to Iwamura,
"Ridgeline is quite an important model to us. It's the only truck-type of model we have. We're fully aware of the importance of that model and we're trying to make that model grow much more. At this moment, there is no intention to stop the Ridgeline. In order to make Ridgeline much more attractive – in order to enhance Ridgeline – we are studying lots of things at this moment."
When further pressed if Honda remains fully committed to this segment, Iwamura confirmed that the company is indeed in it for the long haul, though he declined to say that that the Ridgeline would get a second-generation model. Still, it sounds like Honda is still expecting to offer something with a bed, and the Ridgeline can't continue to soldier on indefinitely as-is... might the Japanese automaker ponder a radical new direction like the rumored CR-V-based successor?
 

Zembonez

живи свободно или умри
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
May 17, 2009
Posts
57,295
Reaction score
36
If it had a proper V8 it would compete well with the Avalanche.
 

nubuilder

Why buy new when you can restore?
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
4
Location
La Crosse, WI
If it had a proper V8 it would compete well with the Avalanche.
Even with a V8, I don't think it would. The Ridgeline is a smaller vehicle.

How does the Avalanche do so well even though the Silverado/Sierra is available in a CC? Is it because the ride is different since it's built on a Tahoe platform?

Why don't they just put it out of it's misery and stop sales in the US? :dunno:

:chipper:
 

99sierraman

[don'tcha know]
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Posts
358
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesnoowta
If it had a proper V8 it would compete well with the Avalanche.
Even with a V8, I don't think it would. The Ridgeline is a smaller vehicle.

How does the Avalanche do so well even though the Silverado/Sierra is available in a CC? Is it because the ride is different since it's built on a Tahoe platform?

Why don't they just put it out of it's misery and stop sales in the US? :dunno:

:chipper:


I was actually just thinking the same thing earlier today when I saw one. You'd think the crew cab would have eliminated the need for the Avalanche and yet it still survives. I don't get it.:dunno:
 

nubuilder

Why buy new when you can restore?
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
4
Location
La Crosse, WI
If it had a proper V8 it would compete well with the Avalanche.
Even with a V8, I don't think it would. The Ridgeline is a smaller vehicle.

How does the Avalanche do so well even though the Silverado/Sierra is available in a CC? Is it because the ride is different since it's built on a Tahoe platform?

Why don't they just put it out of it's misery and stop sales in the US? :dunno:

:chipper:


I was actually just thinking the same thing earlier today when I saw one. You'd think the crew cab would have eliminated the need for the Avalanche and yet it still survives. I don't get it.:dunno:
My thoughts exactly. And how many Avalanche owners actually fold down the rear seat/window and haul longer items?
 

jhoff8487

Blah blah blah.
Joined
May 31, 2009
Posts
542
Reaction score
0
Location
Indy
My thoughts exactly. And how many Avalanche owners actually fold down the rear seat/window and haul longer items?

My dad had a 2002 Avalanche and loved that thing. It was just enough truck for what he needed/wanted a truck for at the time and we got cars cheaper then through my mom's job at GM so the extra bucks wasn't a big deal. He's got a 2009 Sierra now and he switched to the Sierra due to the price difference (Mom's company got sold out of GM) and all of the children are gone so the crew cab wasn't as critical. He is not as happy with the Sierra as he was the Avalanche but for the difference in $$$ now, it couldn't be justified. Plus in 2002, you couldn't get a half ton crew cab (IIRC). That had a lot to do with it too.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
28,836
Posts
1,109,352
Members
4,800
Latest member
SpeakerMan
Back
Top